← Back to blog METHOD

How to Interpret 5-Gas Results: A Structured Approach

Observe → hypothesise → cross-check → confirm. A repeatable process that turns five numbers into a diagnosis.

Five numbers on a screen mean nothing without a method. This is the four-step flow used by the 4D engine — and it works equally well without any software at all.

Step 1 · Observe

Record the raw numbers at warm idle. Note anything outside the normal band:

  • CO > 0.5% at idle
  • CO₂ < 12% at idle
  • HC > 200 ppm
  • O₂ > 1% with CO not-zero (mixed signal)
  • NOₓ > 100 ppm at idle

Step 2 · Hypothesise (signature matching)

Match the pattern to a known signature. A handful of canonical patterns covers most real-world faults:

  • Vacuum leak: high O₂, low CO₂, λ > 1.3
  • Rich idle: high CO, low O₂, λ < 0.9
  • Misfire: very high HC, moderate CO, elevated O₂
  • Cat failure: CO/HC pass-through between pre- and post-cat (where accessible)
  • EGR stuck open: rough idle, low NOₓ even loaded, moderate HC
  • SAI active: high O₂ and low CO during cold phase, normalises when warm

Step 3 · Cross-check

Two independent sources that should agree:

  • λ_calc vs λ_meas: Bretschneider lambda vs wideband.
  • Fuel trims: STFT and LTFT should match the gas direction.
  • Freeze frame: was the fault at cold start, load, deceleration?

If any of these disagree with the hypothesis, revisit before committing to a repair.

Step 4 · Confirm

Perform a physical test that directly proves the hypothesis:

  • Smoke / propane test for vacuum leaks
  • Holy Grail graph (lambda vs rpm sweep)
  • Cylinder balance or relative compression
  • Pre-post cat temperature or O₂ activity ratio

// principle

Never commission a repair on signature alone. One gas pattern can fit several faults — it's the cross-check and confirmation that makes it a diagnosis.

Advertisement